top of page

Strategic alignment in SMEs: a major challenge (#2/3) "Mid-management"

Enjeu de management majeur : l'alignement du management
Enjeu de management majeur : l'alignement du management

The concept of alignment within SMEs/mid-sized companies and the resulting managerial challenges (#2/3)

"Mid-management"


Mid-management:

Translator or vision deviator in SMEs / Mid-sized companies


Introduction


In any growing organization, there is a critical point where a vision can either spread or fragment :


  • mid-management.

  • Team managers, business unit managers, department heads, site directors…


They are the ones who translate or distort the CEO's vision.


In SMEs/mid-sized companies with 50 to 5,000 employees, the majority of execution problems do not stem from a lack of will, but from a lack of managerial translation , coherence and prioritization.



1. The central role of middle management: transforming a vision into concrete actions


The role of middle management is twofold:


1) Translate the vision into local priorities


An industrial director, a sales manager or a marketing manager cannot repeat the vision “as is”.


He must transform it into:

  • 3 to 5 local objectives,

  • a concrete action plan,

  • visible arbitrations,

  • expected behaviors.


2) Synchronize priorities between departments


Mid-management is the point of friction where the following meet:

  • marketing vs. sales

  • finance vs operations

  • headquarters vs. sites

  • international vs local.


This is often where disagreements arise.



2. The 4 recurring causes of mid-management misalignment


2.1 Priority Overload


Managers receive too much:

  • projects,

  • reporting

  • of contradictory injunctions.


Everything becomes important → therefore nothing is.


2.2 Lack of training in strategic translation


Many are excellent technicians or salespeople… Who became managers through internal promotion.


But translating a vision is not intuitive.


2.3 Conflicting KPIs between departments


A classic for SMEs/mid-sized companies:

  • marketing wants the image,

  • Salespeople want volume.

  • Finance wants the margin.

  • operations want stability.


The middle manager has to make decisions without a clear framework. This leads to discrepancies in execution between business units or sites.


2.4 Daily pressure


Middle management is constantly absorbed by the short term:

  • operational risks,

  • Customer emergencies,

  • internal requests.


These emergencies consume strategic energy.



3. Concrete examples — French SMEs/mid-sized companies


🔎 Michel & Augustin (~300–400 employees)


Rapid growth, diversification, internationalization.


The challenge:

Maintain a consistent message between marketing, production and sales teams.


The lever:

Refocus managers on 3 cross-functional priorities to stabilize execution.


🔎 Lacroix Group (~4,000 employees)


A clear vision of the industry of the future.

  • Challenge: digital maturity levels vary greatly depending on the sites and business units.

  • Impact: Uneven execution, slowed projects.

  • Solution: management training programs + strategic playbook.


🔎 Paredes (~1,200 employees)


Major cultural and commercial transformation.

  • Challenge: to translate a value-add strategy into field practices.

  • The turning point: standardization of marketing messages + synchronization rituals.



4. How to make middle management truly aligned


4.1 Provide them with a clear “translation framework”


A short document that specifies the:

  • 3 annual priorities,

  • Key messages to disseminate,

  • Decisions already made,

  • Limits of maneuverability.


Without a framework, each manager reinterprets according to their own style.


4.2 Train managers in communicating the vision


Objective :

To make them capable of "cascading" vision without distorting it.


Key content:

  • Clarification,

  • Consistency,

  • Arbitration,

  • Internal communication

  • Managing paradoxes (quality vs. volume, innovation vs. costs…).


4.3 Structurally reduce the number of priorities


A simple rule:

Never more than 3 priorities per quarter .


If each service has 7 departures in parallel, execution is impossible.


4.4 Synchronize KPIs between departments


To avoid contradictions:


  • a common set of KPIs aligned with the vision,

  • additional indicators by profession,

  • removal of “toxic” KPIs (which encourage behaviors contrary to the strategy).


4.5 Implementing cross-functional alignment rituals


Examples:

  • Monthly Marketing-Sales Committee,

  • Headquarters-site synchronization,

  • Quarterly strategic alignment review.


These rituals reduce differences before they become systemic.


5. Results observed in aligned SMEs/mid-sized companies


  • Smoother internal communication.

  • Faster and more consistent execution.

  • Less inter-professional tension.

  • Best customer quality.

  • A more consistent brand image.

  • An organization less dependent on the CEO to clarify priorities.



Conclusion


Middle management is the main amplifier — or weakener — of the leader's vision.


When trained, guided, and equipped with a clear framework, the organization progresses coherently.


When left alone to face internal contradictions, the CEO's vision becomes fragmented, and execution deteriorates.


The challenge for any SME/mid-sized company is therefore to equip its managers so that they become not just hierarchical relays, but true strategic translators .



Comments


bottom of page